A recent news story in the local paper irritated me enough to need to rant.
Then the rant turned into a manifesto. It’s not meant to be ‘political’.
It starts with a the news that the City of York Council failed in a bid to become a ‘UK City of Culture’ because it’s ‘regeneration’ is based on ‘Science City York’ rather than the arts.
The council failed to meet the benchmarks on ‘funding’ for the arts.
The councillor responsible for culture went on to say the council would be entering a bid for UNESCO’s Creative Cities programme in 2010, on the basis of it’s investment in ‘science’.
So many points…
· York is already full of culture, the measure should be how much culture there is not a benchmark on funding
· Science City York (SCY) is a misnomer as much work is done on ‘Creative York’ under that ‘banner’ name that would qualify as ‘culture’
· The council do funds ‘arts’: What is Illuminate?
· How can we apply to be a ‘Creative City’ based on investment in science. It’s nonsensical.
In my opinion, the root of the opportunity is this:
Economic regeneration strategies have to be built on creating, growing & sustaining jobs and wealth.
The ‘Knowledge Economy’ is one in which the UK in general can compete in a world market.
Which means the city of York can compete if it looks to intellectual property, adding value and service as the driving force.
The idea of ‘Science City’ isn’t comprehensive enough. It doesn’t tell our whole story.
For example, Yorkshire Forward needed to talk up it’s job creation in digital and creative sectors to central government. ‘SCY’ ‘created’ Creative York by re-branding the Heritage and Arts organisation that already existed and inviting broader ‘creative’ organisations to join. Then claim job creation and innovation as part of it’s remit / measure of success to secure support.
However, bringing ‘creative’ companies together is like herding cats. Although some move in for a stroke when their ego needs a boost, most will wander off to find a warmer spot where there is milk and food without competition. (As a ‘creative company’ we weren’t sure we were being used for political benefit and as second class to Science and IT in the hierarchy of this organisation.)
All the big Science firms and IT firms get recognition and huge financial investment and create jobs for the 100s of students graduating from the University of York, which is good. We must keep the talent.
But creative business are smaller and more numerous and York St John is not a centre of Science. We must create an environment for the Cultural output from their talent too.
Creative businesses need recognition. They need funding. They need shouting about.
Vision
There is one overriding and common value in science and art that distils to an idea and that is intellectual property.
Innovation in any field creates value. Creates jobs. Creates wealth.
If SCY had been called ‘Copyright York’ or ‘IP York’ or Knowledge York then SCY or IT City York or Creative York could all coexist and we would be a city of culture, a city of creativity, a city of sustainable value whether we had government recognition or not.
How long can we keep calling ourselves the ‘Cambridge of the North’, when other than academically (and some would argue even there) we have more history and culture in our little fingers than the Essex upstart.
Let’s drop the brand Science City. We are almost 2000 years old. We will still be here in 2000 more because York is at the centre of England, it adapts and it will overcome.
To paraphrase George V, ‘The future of York is the future of England’.

