I don’t know if it’s because of my age, my background or my sense of fairness that I feel hurt by the exploitation of businesses by some of my fellow professionals both in design and in the media.
If this sounds like a rant – I apologise in advance. It is.
If it sounds self serving – I apologise in advance. It is.
I detest ‘waste’. After 25 years in the marketing business it still surprises and frustrates me how businesses with significant ‘promotional’ budget allow their ‘creative’ suppliers to present, implement and ineffectually measure the effectiveness of the work they produce, and how disrespectful some media are to these businesses on the effectiveness of their channel.
The issue in ‘design’ occurs for many reasons, but primarily because of the way many designers charge. It is in their best interests to spend as much time and in as many media channels as possible.
I believe you are what you’re paid. If you are ‘retained’ you’re an employee. If you’re on commission, you’re a salesman, if you are paid by the hour you’re an artisan and if you’re paid by the improvement you make to the bottom line with a fee, then – and only then – can you call yourself a consultant.
In the scenario I come across all too often, the more the designer can do, the more they make.
Many will not say, ‘actually you need to improve your customer service, or delivery’. Instead they will say, ‘yes – you need new packaging, a new website, a new brochure, a new ad campaign’.
I wonder why?
They are not given an objective and a budget and asked to create an effective communication plan.
They are designers not communication strategists after all.
This isn’t true of all design companies, but is a trend in those that supply SMEs.
This is because anyone a few years out of college, who knows there way around Adobe Photoshop, Illustrator, InDesign or Quark etc., (never mind online applications / tools!) can set up as a ‘branding design agency’. No experience or expertise required.
Branding expertise doesn’t come from knowing how to create a logo. Just because you call yourself a ‘branding expert’ doesn’t make you one.
Then there is the media. The media never say ‘actually we don’t give great value in reaching your target audience’. If a client’s needs expert advice on what are the best ways of getting their message to their audience the last place they should ask is a media channel. How many businesses deal direct with media and then let the media ‘create’ the communication piece.
You only need to listen to local radio for 30 minutes or look in a local newspaper for the evidence.
Advertising can work. It generally doesn’t.
Advertising well is difficult.
So who am I to talk. Well I am a branding and communications practitioner.
I can sleep at night and look at myself in the morning with a clear conscience, because I save businesses money. Sometimes that is the only objective – and that’s enough.
Sometimes it is in order to use that resource in more effective channels. Make the finite resource more of a return on the investment of it.
To do this I have to understand not just what a brand is and how it can be improved, but how to create, grow or sustain them with new and / or existing audiences. I need to know what media is good for what effect. How to choose. How to buy. How to measure.
This takes not only years of practicing, but also continuous professional development. It is the reason I am adept in new media channels.
No I am not a social media expert / guru / ninja. I am a contextualiser. Every advantage and disadvantage needs to be understood so that the right tool can be chosen for the right job.
Social media is a part of the online media. Online media is a part of all communications channels. Communication or ‘promotion’ is only one of the ever increasing number of P’s in the marketing mix.
(NB I believe it is fraudulent to claim ‘expertise’ in something like social media that only started 5 minutes ago and will change by the time I publish this and definitely by the time you read it– shame on those that do)
Acute Marketing is named after a philosophy that has a metaphor in medicine and an insight that most clients are looking for new solutions when things need changing – fast.
Positive change can only come by following the methodological approach of ‘Diagnosis’ before ‘Treatment’. Treatment before Cure’.
Likewise, marketing communications and brand development.
Diagnosis has a value. Treatment has a value. Ultimately a Cure has value too.
If you want more value from your brand communications get a second opinion.

